Quadro K2000M vs Tesla T4
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro K2000M and Tesla T4. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro K2000M and Tesla T4. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla T4
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K2000M | Tesla T4 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla T4 has 27% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
- Quadro K2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla T4 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla T4 has 14 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
- Quadro K2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K2000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 160 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- Quadro K2000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 8200 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| Quadro K2000M and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 190% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla T4. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 144% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 443% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 677% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 41% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K2000M | Tesla T4 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
| Code name | N14P-Q3 | TU104 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 June 2012 | 13 September 2018 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 585 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.84 | 254.4 |
| Floating-point performance | 572.2 gflops | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 10000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | 7.5 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |