FirePro S7150 vs Quadro K2100M
When choosing between FirePro S7150 and Quadro K2100M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7150 and Quadro K2100M.
FirePro S7150
Quadro K2100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2100M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7150 | Quadro K2100M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 has 172% more power consumption, than Quadro K2100M.
- FirePro S7150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2100M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S7150 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro K2100M.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2100M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Quadro K2100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 253 MHz higher, than Quadro K2100M.
- FirePro S7150 and Quadro K2100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 2000 MHz higher, than Quadro K2100M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 412% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 151% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 487% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 292% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 425% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 232% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 41% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 119% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 344% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 21−24 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 461% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 45% more, than Quadro K2100M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7150 | Quadro K2100M | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tonga | GK106 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 1 February 2016 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 576 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 667 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 2,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 32.02 |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 768.4 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 48.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 38 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |