FireStream 9270 vs Quadro K2100M
When choosing between FireStream 9270 and Quadro K2100M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9270 and Quadro K2100M.
FireStream 9270
Quadro K2100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2100M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Quadro K2100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 190% more power consumption, than Quadro K2100M.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2100M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9270 and Quadro K2100M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2100M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro K2100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 83 MHz higher, than Quadro K2100M.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K2100M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 600 MHz higher, than Quadro K2100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 14% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| FireStream 9270 and Quadro K2100M have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| FireStream 9270 and Quadro K2100M have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| FireStream 9270 and Quadro K2100M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Fortnite is 10% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| FireStream 9270 and Quadro K2100M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 2% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| FireStream 9270 and Quadro K2100M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 8% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in World of Tanks is 9% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Quadro K2100M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
| Code name | RV770 | GK106 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 576 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 2,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 32.02 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 768.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 48.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 38 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |