FireStream 9370 vs Quadro K2100M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9370 and Quadro K2100M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9370 and Quadro K2100M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9370
Quadro K2100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2100M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Quadro K2100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 309% more power consumption, than Quadro K2100M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2100M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2100M.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2100M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro K2100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 158 MHz higher, than Quadro K2100M.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2100M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 1600 MHz higher, than Quadro K2100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 107% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9370 and Quadro K2100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 112% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 65% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 60% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 17% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 77% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 92% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 30% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Quadro K2100M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
| Code name | Cypress | GK106 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 576 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | 2,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 32.02 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 768.4 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 48.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 38 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |