GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro K2100M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro K2100M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro K2100M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Quadro K2100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2100M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro K2100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 172% more power consumption, than Quadro K2100M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2100M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K2100M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K2100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 633 MHz higher, than Quadro K2100M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2100M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2100M is 1300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro K2100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 27% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 30% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 35% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 12% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 44% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 53% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 15% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro K2100M | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Code name | GF104 | GK106 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 576 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 2,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 32.02 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 768.4 gflops |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 48.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | + |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | 38 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |
| Check Price |