GeForce GTX 760A vs Quadro K2100M
When choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K2100M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K2100M.
GeForce GTX 760A
Quadro K2100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2100M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro K2100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 55 Watt.
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2100M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K2100M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K2100M are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2100M is 39 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K2100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 1008 MHz higher, than Quadro K2100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K2100M have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Fortnite is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Minecraft is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in World of Tanks is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro K2100M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK106 | GK106 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 576 |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 2,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 32.02 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 768.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 48.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 38 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |