GRID K260Q vs Quadro K2100M
When choosing between GRID K260Q and Quadro K2100M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K260Q and Quadro K2100M.
GRID K260Q
Quadro K2100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2100M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K260Q | Quadro K2100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 309% more power consumption, than Quadro K2100M.
- GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2100M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GRID K260Q and Quadro K2100M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K260Q and Quadro K2100M are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 78 MHz higher, than Quadro K2100M.
- GRID K260Q and Quadro K2100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 2000 MHz higher, than Quadro K2100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 137% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K260Q and Quadro K2100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 63% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 137% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 84% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 125% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 85% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 24% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 55% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 130% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K260Q | Quadro K2100M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK104 | GK106 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 576 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 32.02 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 768.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 48.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 38 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |