GRID K520 vs Quadro K2100M
When choosing between GRID K520 and Quadro K2100M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K520 and Quadro K2100M.
GRID K520
Quadro K2100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2100M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K520 | Quadro K2100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 309% more power consumption, than Quadro K2100M.
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2100M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2100M.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K520 and Quadro K2100M are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 78 MHz higher, than Quadro K2100M.
- GRID K520 and Quadro K2100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 2000 MHz higher, than Quadro K2100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 153% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K520 and Quadro K2100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | − |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 78% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 69% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 162% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 103% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 96% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 19% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 122% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 153% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 41% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K520 | Quadro K2100M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK104 | GK106 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 576 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 32.02 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 768.4 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 48.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | 38 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |