GRID M10 8Q vs Quadro K2100M
When choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Quadro K2100M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID M10 8Q and Quadro K2100M.
GRID M10 8Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro K2100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2100M here:
Main Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Quadro K2100M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 309% more power consumption, than Quadro K2100M.
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2100M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro K2100M.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro K2100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 366 MHz higher, than Quadro K2100M.
- GRID M10 8Q and Quadro K2100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 2200 MHz higher, than Quadro K2100M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 107% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M10 8Q and Quadro K2100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 58% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 69% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 77% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 30% more, than Quadro K2100M. |
Full Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Quadro K2100M | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM107 | GK106 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 18 May 2016 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 640 | 576 |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 667 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 32.02 |
Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 768.4 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 48.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | + |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 38 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |