Quadro K2100M vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
In this comparison between Quadro K2100M and Radeon HD 4850 X2 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2100M will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 4850 X2 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4850 X2
Quadro K2100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2100M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K2100M | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 354% more power consumption, than Quadro K2100M.
- Quadro K2100M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon HD 4850 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 510 GB more memory, than Quadro K2100M.
- Quadro K2100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K2100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2100M is 42 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
- Quadro K2100M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2100M is 1010 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Battlefield 5 is 27% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Fortnite is 18% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Minecraft is 1% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K2100M | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Code name | GK106 | R700 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 7 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 576 | 800 |
| Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.02 | 25.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 768.4 gflops | 2x 1,000.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | 1990 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.0 GB/s | 63.68 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 38 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |