Quadro K2100M vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro K2100M and Radeon R5 430 OEM, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro K2100M stacks up against Radeon R5 430 OEM, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Quadro K2100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2100M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K2100M | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K2100M has 10% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Quadro K2100M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro K2100M and Radeon R5 430 OEM have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro K2100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- Quadro K2100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 63 MHz higher, than Quadro K2100M.
- Quadro K2100M and Radeon R5 430 OEM are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 1600 MHz higher, than Quadro K2100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Battlefield 5 is 75% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| Quadro K2100M and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Dota 2 is 17% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Fortnite is 44% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 87% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Minecraft is 10% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 85% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K2100M | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK106 | Oland |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 576 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.02 | 18.72 |
| Floating-point performance | 768.4 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.0 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 38 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |