Quadro K2100M vs Radeon R9 A375
In this comparison between Quadro K2100M and Radeon R9 A375 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2100M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 A375 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 A375
Quadro K2100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2100M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2100M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2100M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro K2100M and Radeon R9 A375 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro K2100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K2100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 233 MHz higher, than Quadro K2100M.
- Quadro K2100M and Radeon R9 A375 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2100M is 2996 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Battlefield 5 is 55% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro K2100M and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Fortnite is 36% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Minecraft is 5% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 83% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 85% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in World of Tanks is 15% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
Quadro K2100M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK106 | Venus |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | no data |
Pipelines | 576 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.02 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 768.4 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 48.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 38 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro K2100M vs FirePro V5800
- Quadro K2100M vs Radeon 540
- Radeon R9 A375 vs FirePro V5800
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon 540
- Quadro K2100M vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Quadro K2100M vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M