FirePro V5900 vs Quadro K2200

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro V5900 and Quadro K2200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro V5900 and Quadro K2200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

FirePro V5900 Check Price

Quadro K2200 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro V5900	Quadro K2200
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	68 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V5900 has 10% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K2200 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro V5900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V5900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Quadro K2200 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2200 is 446 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200 - by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro V5900 is 28 mm longer, than Quadro K2200.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200 is 3012 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	4−5	18−20
ultra / 1080p	2−3	10−11
QHD / 1440p	1−2	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	14−16	35−40
medium / 1080p	7−8	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	27−30
ultra / 1080p	8−9	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	21−24	60−65
medium / 1080p	10−12	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Battlefield 5 is 184% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	130−140	220−230
medium / 768p	100−110	190−200
ultra / 1080p	50−55	110−120
QHD / 1440p	24−27	75−80
4K / 2160p	12−14	40−45
high / 768p	75−80	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 100% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	50−55	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 41% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	80−85	110−120
medium / 768p	55−60	100−110
ultra / 1080p	30−35	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Dota 2 is 73% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	6−7	21−24
ultra / 1080p	5−6	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	5−6	7−8
low / 720p	16−18	45−50
medium / 1080p	7−8	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	7−8	27−30
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	110−120
medium / 1080p	18−20	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Fortnite is 150% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 720p	21−24	60−65
medium / 1080p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 193% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	50−55	95−100
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	10−11	35−40
ultra / 1080p	4−5	14−16
QHD / 1440p	−	5−6
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	3−4	10−12
ultra / 1080p	1−2	9−10
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	10−11	35−40
medium / 1080p	4−5	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Metro Exodus is 260% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Minecraft is 25% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	6−7	−
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	65−70
medium / 1080p	9−10	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 153% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	10−11	35−40
medium / 1080p	9−10	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 180% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	20−22	65−70
medium / 768p	12−14	40−45
high / 1080p	6−7	21−24
ultra / 1080p	4−5	12−14
4K / 2160p	3−4	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	75−80	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	35−40
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than FirePro V5900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V5900	Quadro K2200
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Maxwell
Code name	Cayman	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 May 2011	22 July 2014
Pipelines	512	640
Core clock speed	600 MHz	1046 MHz
Boost Clock		1124 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	19.20	44.96
Floating-point performance	614.4 gflops	1,439 gflops
Length	230 mm	202 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	80.19 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	66 Mh/s	162 Mh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		1.6 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V5900 vs Quadro K2200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares