GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K2200

When comparing GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro K2200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro K2200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GeForce GTX 280

Quadro K2200 Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 280	Quadro K2200
Power consumption (TDP)	236 Watt	68 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	6-pin & 8-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x S-Video	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
		Check Price

GeForce GTX 280 has 247% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K2200 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K2200 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 250 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200.
GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200 - by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K2200 is 192 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 280.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200 is 3905 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	1−2	18−20
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	12−14	35−40
medium / 1080p	3−4	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 280.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	4−5	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	16−18	60−65
medium / 1080p	5−6	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than GeForce GTX 280.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 280.
low / 768p	120−130	220−230
medium / 768p	90−95	190−200
ultra / 1080p	40−45	110−120
QHD / 1440p	21−24	75−80
4K / 2160p	18−20	40−45
high / 768p	65−70	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 122% more, than GeForce GTX 280.
low / 768p	85−90	60−65
ultra / 1080p	16−18	45−50
medium / 1080p	40−45	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 280.
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
medium / 768p	50−55	100−110
ultra / 1080p	24−27	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Dota 2 is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 280.
high / 1080p	2−3	21−24
ultra / 1080p	2−3	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	0−1	7−8
low / 720p	10−12	45−50
medium / 1080p	3−4	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Far Cry 5 is 625% more, than GeForce GTX 280.
high / 1080p	10−11	27−30
ultra / 1080p	5−6	21−24
QHD / 1440p	2−3	14−16
low / 720p	50−55	110−120
medium / 1080p	10−12	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Fortnite is 206% more, than GeForce GTX 280.
high / 1080p	4−5	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
low / 720p	16−18	60−65
medium / 1080p	7−8	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 388% more, than GeForce GTX 280.
low / 768p	40−45	95−100
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	5−6	35−40
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than GeForce GTX 280.
high / 1080p	1−2	10−12
ultra / 1080p	0−1	9−10
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	5−6	35−40
medium / 1080p	3−4	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than GeForce GTX 280.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
high / 1080p	85−90	−
ultra / 1080p	70−75	−
medium / 1080p	90−95	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Minecraft is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 280.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	65−70
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 280.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	4−5	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 360% more, than GeForce GTX 280.
low / 768p	12−14	65−70
medium / 768p	8−9	40−45
high / 1080p	4−5	21−24
ultra / 1080p	3−4	12−14
4K / 2160p	0−1	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 414% more, than GeForce GTX 280.
low / 768p	75−80	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	16−18	35−40
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 280.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 280	Quadro K2200
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Maxwell
Code name	GT200	GM107
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	16 June 2008	22 July 2014
Pipelines	240	640
Core clock speed	1296 MHz	1046 MHz
Boost Clock		1124 MHz
Transistor count	1,400 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	48.2 billion/sec	44.96
Floating-point performance	622.1 gflops	1,439 gflops
Length	10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)	202 mm
Memory bus width	512 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1107 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	141.7 GB/s	80.19 GB/s
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.0	5.1
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	+	5.0
CUDA cores	240
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options	+
Multi monitor support	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		162 Mh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		1.6 Mh/s
		Check Price

GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K2200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares