GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro K2200

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro K2200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 v2 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTX 460 v2

Quadro K2200 Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 460 v2	Quadro K2200
Power consumption (TDP)	160 Watt	68 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
		Check Price

GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 135% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K2200 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K2200 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2200 is 267 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200 - by 28 nm process technology.
GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 8 mm longer, than Quadro K2200.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200 is 1004 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−11	18−20
ultra / 1080p	6−7	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	21−24	35−40
medium / 1080p	12−14	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 69% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
high / 1080p	16−18	27−30
ultra / 1080p	14−16	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	35−40	60−65
medium / 1080p	16−18	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Battlefield 5 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
low / 768p	160−170	220−230
medium / 768p	130−140	190−200
ultra / 1080p	70−75	110−120
QHD / 1440p	40−45	75−80
4K / 2160p	30−33	40−45
high / 768p	100−110	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 49% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
medium / 768p	70−75	100−110
ultra / 1080p	45−50	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Dota 2 is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
high / 1080p	10−12	21−24
ultra / 1080p	10−12	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	4−5	7−8
low / 720p	27−30	45−50
medium / 1080p	12−14	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Far Cry 5 is 84% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
high / 1080p	18−20	27−30
ultra / 1080p	12−14	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	75−80	110−120
medium / 1080p	30−35	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Fortnite is 65% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
high / 1080p	16−18	30−35
ultra / 1080p	14−16	21−24
QHD / 1440p	4−5	10−12
low / 720p	35−40	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
low / 768p	65−70	95−100
medium / 768p	55−60	85−90
high / 1080p	18−20	35−40
ultra / 1080p	8−9	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
high / 1080p	6−7	10−12
ultra / 1080p	5−6	9−10
4K / 2160p	1−2	2−3
low / 720p	18−20	35−40
medium / 1080p	8−9	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Metro Exodus is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	90−95	−
medium / 1080p	95−100	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	40−45	65−70
medium / 1080p	20−22	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	8−9	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	18−20	35−40
medium / 1080p	12−14	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
low / 768p	35−40	65−70
medium / 768p	21−24	40−45
high / 1080p	12−14	21−24
ultra / 1080p	8−9	12−14
4K / 2160p	7−8	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	50−55	60−65
ultra / 1080p	24−27	35−40
high / 768p	40−45	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 460 v2	Quadro K2200
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Maxwell
Code name	GF114	GM107
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	24 September 2011	22 July 2014
Pipelines	336	640
Core clock speed	779 MHz	1046 MHz
Boost Clock		1124 MHz
Transistor count	1,950 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	43.62	44.96
Floating-point performance	1,045.6 gflops	1,439 gflops
Length	210 mm	202 mm
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4008 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96.19 GB/s	80.19 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	2.1	5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	75 Mh/s	162 Mh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		1.6 Mh/s
		Check Price

GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro K2200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares