Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Quadro K2200
When comparing Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro K2200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro K2200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Quadro K2200
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
68 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
System Shared
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K2200 has 353% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Quadro K2200 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2200 - in Desktops.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Quadro K2200 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2200 is 746 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
18−20
ultra / 1080p
3−4
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Battlefield 5 is 263% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
110−120
220−230
medium / 768p
85−90
190−200
ultra / 1080p
40−45
110−120
QHD / 1440p
24−27
75−80
4K / 2160p
−
40−45
high / 768p
60−65
160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 134% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
70−75
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
ultra / 1080p
24−27
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
3−4
7−8
low / 720p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
6−7
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Far Cry 5 is 242% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
8−9
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
110−120
medium / 1080p
14−16
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Fortnite is 163% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
9−10
30−35
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
low / 720p
18−20
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−11
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 238% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
40−45
95−100
medium / 768p
35−40
85−90
high / 1080p
8−9
35−40
ultra / 1080p
5−6
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 156% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
3−4
10−12
ultra / 1080p
2−3
9−10
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
8−9
35−40
medium / 1080p
5−6
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Metro Exodus is 260% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
65−70
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 73% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 187% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
16−18
65−70
medium / 768p
12−14
40−45
high / 1080p
7−8
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Quadro K2200
Architecture
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Maxwell
Code name
Broadwell GT3e
GM107
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
2 June 2015
22 July 2014
Pipelines
48
640
Core clock speed
300 MHz
1046 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1124 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
40.80
44.96
Floating-point performance
883.2 gflops
1,439 gflops
Length
202 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80.19 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.1.126
CUDA
5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
162 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
1.6 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
