NVS 510 vs Quadro K2200

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between NVS 510 and Quadro K2200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the NVS 510 stacks up against Quadro K2200, check out specs charts below.

NVS 510 Check Price

Quadro K2200 Check Price

Main Specs

	NVS 510	Quadro K2200
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	68 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K2200 has 94% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K2200 has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro K2200 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2200 is 249 MHz higher, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 and Quadro K2200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K2200 is 42 mm longer, than NVS 510.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200 is 3230 MHz higher, than NVS 510.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	1−2	35−40
medium / 1080p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	60−65
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
NVS 510 and Quadro K2200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	60−65	220−230
medium / 768p	27−30	190−200
ultra / 1080p	7−8	110−120
QHD / 1440p	−	75−80
4K / 2160p	−	40−45
high / 768p	16−18	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 525% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
NVS 510 and Quadro K2200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	110−120
medium / 768p	10−11	100−110
ultra / 1080p	0−1	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	24−27
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	110−120
medium / 1080p	0−1	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Fortnite is 422% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	0−1	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
low / 720p	0−1	60−65
medium / 1080p	0−1	35−40
low / 768p	18−20	95−100
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	0−1	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	10−12
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Minecraft is 49% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
low / 768p	0−1	65−70
medium / 768p	−	40−45
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
high / 768p	12−14	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than NVS 510.

Full Specs

	NVS 510	Quadro K2200
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Code name	GK107	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	23 October 2012	22 July 2014
Pipelines	192	640
Core clock speed	797 MHz	1046 MHz
Boost Clock		1124 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	12.75	44.96
Floating-point performance	306.0 gflops	1,439 gflops
Length	160 mm	202 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	80.19 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	17 Mh/s	162 Mh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		1.6 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 510 vs Quadro K2200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares