NVS 810 vs Quadro K2200

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between NVS 810 and Quadro K2200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the NVS 810 stacks up against Quadro K2200, check out specs charts below.

NVS 810 Check Price

Quadro K2200 Check Price

Main Specs

	NVS 810	Quadro K2200
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	68 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	8x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 68 Watt.
NVS 810 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2200 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K2200 has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 810.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 810 and Quadro K2200 are build with Maxwell architecture.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2200 is 144 MHz higher, than NVS 810.
NVS 810 and Quadro K2200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K2200 is 4 mm longer, than NVS 810.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200 is 3212 MHz higher, than NVS 810.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	18−20
ultra / 1080p	1−2	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	12−14	35−40
medium / 1080p	4−5	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	5−6	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	16−18	60−65
medium / 1080p	6−7	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
NVS 810 and Quadro K2200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	120−130	220−230
medium / 768p	95−100	190−200
ultra / 1080p	40−45	110−120
QHD / 1440p	21−24	75−80
4K / 2160p	16−18	40−45
high / 768p	65−70	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 119% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	65−70	60−65
ultra / 1080p	20−22	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	80−85	110−120
medium / 768p	45−50	100−110
ultra / 1080p	21−24	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Dota 2 is 98% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	2−3	21−24
ultra / 1080p	2−3	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	2−3	7−8
low / 720p	10−12	45−50
medium / 1080p	4−5	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	10−11	27−30
ultra / 1080p	5−6	21−24
QHD / 1440p	4−5	14−16
low / 720p	50−55	110−120
medium / 1080p	10−12	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Fortnite is 206% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	5−6	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	3−4	10−12
4K / 2160p	2−3	−
low / 720p	18−20	60−65
medium / 1080p	8−9	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 288% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	45−50	95−100
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	4−5	35−40
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	2−3	10−12
ultra / 1080p	0−1	9−10
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	4−5	35−40
medium / 1080p	3−4	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
high / 1080p	80−85	−
ultra / 1080p	70−75	−
medium / 1080p	85−90	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Minecraft is 27% more, than NVS 810.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	65−70
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	10−11	65−70
medium / 768p	8−9	40−45
high / 1080p	4−5	21−24
ultra / 1080p	4−5	12−14
4K / 2160p	1−2	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	35−40
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than NVS 810.

Full Specs

	NVS 810	Quadro K2200
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell
Code name	GM107	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	4 November 2015	22 July 2014
Pipelines	512	640
Core clock speed	902 MHz	1046 MHz
Boost Clock	1033 MHz	1124 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	33.06	44.96
Floating-point performance	2x 1,058 gflops	1,439 gflops
Length	198 mm	202 mm
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	80.19 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	5.0	5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		162 Mh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		1.6 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 810 vs Quadro K2200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares