Quadro K1000M vs Quadro K2200
When comparing Quadro K1000M and Quadro K2200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K1000M and Quadro K2200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K1000M
Quadro K2200
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
68 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K2200 has 51% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
Quadro K1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro K2200 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K2200 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K1000M.
Quadro K1000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro K2200 - in Desktops.
Quadro K1000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro K2200 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2200 is 196 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
Quadro K1000M and Quadro K2200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200 is 3212 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
1−2
35−40
medium / 1080p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
0−1
60−65
medium / 1080p
−
30−35
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro K1000M and Quadro K2200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
60−65
220−230
medium / 768p
27−30
190−200
ultra / 1080p
7−8
110−120
QHD / 1440p
−
75−80
4K / 2160p
−
40−45
high / 768p
16−18
160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 525% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
Quadro K1000M and Quadro K2200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
45−50
110−120
medium / 768p
10−11
100−110
ultra / 1080p
0−1
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
0−1
45−50
medium / 1080p
−
24−27
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
21−24
110−120
medium / 1080p
0−1
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Fortnite is 422% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
0−1
30−35
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
low / 720p
0−1
60−65
medium / 1080p
0−1
35−40
low / 768p
18−20
95−100
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
0−1
35−40
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
10−12
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
high / 1080p
27−30
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Quadro K1000M.
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
low / 768p
0−1
65−70
medium / 768p
−
40−45
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
35−40
high / 768p
12−14
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Quadro K1000M.
Full Specs
Quadro K1000M
Quadro K2200
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Code name
N14P-Q1
GM107
Type
Mobile workstation
Workstation
Release date
1 June 2012
22 July 2014
Pipelines
192
640
Core clock speed
850 MHz
1046 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
13.60
44.96
Floating-point performance
326.4 gflops
1,439 gflops
Length
202 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
80.19 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
+
5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
10 Mh/s
162 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
1.6 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price