FirePro M5950 vs Quadro K2200M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M5950 and Quadro K2200M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M5950 and Quadro K2200M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro K2200M
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Quadro K2200M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M has 85% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- Both video cards are using MXM-A (3.0) interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro K2200M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro K2200M - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M5950 is 58 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 4112 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 242% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 272% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 118% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 92% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 333% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 170% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 244% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 156% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 43% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 75% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 187% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 266% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 46% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Quadro K2200M | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | GM107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 19 July 2014 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 26.68 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 853.8 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |