FirePro S9000 vs Quadro K2200M

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S9000 and Quadro K2200M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S9000 stacks up against Quadro K2200M, check out specs charts below.

FirePro S9000

Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

	FirePro S9000	Quadro K2200M
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	65 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	No outputs

FirePro S9000 has 438% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
FirePro S9000 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 233 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
FirePro S9000 and Quadro K2200M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 488 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	20−22
ultra / 1080p	21−24	12−14
QHD / 1440p	16−18	6−7
4K / 2160p	10−11	5−6
low / 720p	60−65	35−40
medium / 1080p	40−45	24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than Quadro K2200M.
high / 1080p	55−60	30−35
ultra / 1080p	45−50	27−30
QHD / 1440p	35−40	10−12
4K / 2160p	18−20	7−8
low / 720p	100−110	65−70
medium / 1080p	60−65	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than Quadro K2200M.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro S9000 and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	230−240
medium / 768p	220−230	200−210
ultra / 1080p	180−190	110−120
QHD / 1440p	110−120	85−90
4K / 2160p	70−75	45−50
high / 768p	210−220	160−170
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Quadro K2200M.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	50−55
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
FirePro S9000 and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	110−120	100−110
ultra / 1080p	100−110	75−80
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Quadro K2200M.
high / 1080p	45−50	24−27
ultra / 1080p	40−45	21−24
QHD / 1440p	27−30	18−20
4K / 2160p	14−16	7−8
low / 720p	80−85	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than Quadro K2200M.
high / 1080p	60−65	30−35
ultra / 1080p	45−50	24−27
QHD / 1440p	27−30	14−16
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	120−130
medium / 1080p	110−120	70−75
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 61% more, than Quadro K2200M.
high / 1080p	60−65	30−35
ultra / 1080p	45−50	24−27
QHD / 1440p	30−35	12−14
4K / 2160p	24−27	12−14
low / 720p	100−110	65−70
medium / 1080p	65−70	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than Quadro K2200M.
low / 768p	140−150	100−110
medium / 768p	120−130	90−95
high / 1080p	70−75	40−45
ultra / 1080p	30−35	16−18
QHD / 1440p	21−24	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than Quadro K2200M.
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	20−22	10−11
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	2−3
low / 720p	65−70	40−45
medium / 1080p	30−35	16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 82% more, than Quadro K2200M.
low / 768p	130−140	120−130
medium / 1080p	120−130	110−120
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro K2200M.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	70−75
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Quadro K2200M.
high / 1080p	24−27	14−16
ultra / 1080p	16−18	10−11
QHD / 1440p	10−11	1−2
4K / 2160p	7−8	1−2
low / 720p	65−70	35−40
medium / 1080p	35−40	20−22
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 92% more, than Quadro K2200M.
low / 768p	130−140	70−75
medium / 768p	85−90	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	24−27
ultra / 1080p	24−27	14−16
4K / 2160p	16−18	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than Quadro K2200M.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	40−45
high / 768p	60−65	55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro K2200M.

Full Specs

	FirePro S9000	Quadro K2200M
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell
Code name	Tahiti	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 August 2012	19 July 2014
Pipelines	1792	640
Core clock speed	900 MHz	667 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	26.68
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	853.8 gflops
Length	267 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	80 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		5.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	92 Mh/s
Optimus		+
Form factor	full height / full length
DisplayPort count	1
Dual-link DVI support	+
Display Port		1.2
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+

FirePro S9000 vs Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares