FirePro V4900 vs Quadro K2200M

In this comparison between FirePro V4900 and Quadro K2200M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V4900 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2200M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro V4900 Check Price

Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

	FirePro V4900	Quadro K2200M
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	65 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price

FirePro V4900 has 15% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
FirePro V4900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Quadro K2200M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V4900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 133 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 1012 MHz higher, than FirePro V4900.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	20−22
ultra / 1080p	1−2	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	12−14	35−40
medium / 1080p	4−5	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 380% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	6−7	30−35
ultra / 1080p	5−6	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	16−18	65−70
medium / 1080p	6−7	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 412% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	35−40	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro V4900 and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	110−120	230−240
medium / 768p	90−95	200−210
ultra / 1080p	40−45	110−120
QHD / 1440p	24−27	85−90
4K / 2160p	−	45−50
high / 768p	65−70	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 136% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	75−80	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	70−75	120−130
medium / 768p	50−55	100−110
ultra / 1080p	24−27	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 104% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	3−4	24−27
ultra / 1080p	2−3	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	1−2	7−8
low / 720p	12−14	50−55
medium / 1080p	4−5	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 420% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	10−12	30−35
ultra / 1080p	6−7	24−27
QHD / 1440p	4−5	14−16
low / 720p	50−55	120−130
medium / 1080p	12−14	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 217% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	7−8	30−35
ultra / 1080p	6−7	24−27
QHD / 1440p	1−2	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	18−20	65−70
medium / 1080p	9−10	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 337% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	45−50	100−110
medium / 768p	35−40	90−95
high / 1080p	6−7	40−45
ultra / 1080p	3−4	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 178% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	2−3	12−14
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−11
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	5−6	40−45
medium / 1080p	3−4	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	85−90	120−130
high / 1080p	60−65	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 43% more, than FirePro V4900.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	24−27	70−75
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	6−7	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	6−7	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	12−14	70−75
medium / 768p	10−11	45−50
high / 1080p	5−6	24−27
ultra / 1080p	4−5	14−16
4K / 2160p	2−3	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 371% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	40−45
high / 768p	30−33	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 50% more, than FirePro V4900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V4900	Quadro K2200M
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Maxwell
Code name	Turks	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	1 November 2011	19 July 2014
Pipelines	480	640
Core clock speed	800 MHz	667 MHz
Transistor count	716 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	19.20	26.68
Floating-point performance	768.0 gflops	853.8 gflops
Length	163 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	80 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.0	5
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	73 Mh/s
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+
	Check Price

FirePro V4900 vs Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares