FirePro V5900 vs Quadro K2200M

In this comparison between FirePro V5900 and Quadro K2200M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5900 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2200M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro V5900 Check Price

Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

	FirePro V5900	Quadro K2200M
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	65 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	No outputs
	Check Price

FirePro V5900 has 15% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
FirePro V5900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
FirePro V5900 and Quadro K2200M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V5900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 67 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 3012 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	4−5	20−22
ultra / 1080p	2−3	12−14
QHD / 1440p	1−2	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	14−16	35−40
medium / 1080p	7−8	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	30−35
ultra / 1080p	8−9	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	21−24	65−70
medium / 1080p	10−12	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 215% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	130−140	230−240
medium / 768p	100−110	200−210
ultra / 1080p	50−55	110−120
QHD / 1440p	24−27	85−90
4K / 2160p	12−14	45−50
high / 768p	75−80	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 108% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	50−55	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 46% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	80−85	120−130
medium / 768p	55−60	100−110
ultra / 1080p	30−35	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 78% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	6−7	24−27
ultra / 1080p	5−6	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	5−6	7−8
low / 720p	16−18	50−55
medium / 1080p	7−8	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	7−8	30−35
ultra / 1080p	0−1	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	120−130
medium / 1080p	18−20	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 171% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	8−9	12−14
low / 720p	21−24	65−70
medium / 1080p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 184% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	50−55	100−110
medium / 768p	−	90−95
high / 1080p	10−11	40−45
ultra / 1080p	4−5	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	6−7
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 145% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	3−4	12−14
ultra / 1080p	1−2	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	10−11	40−45
medium / 1080p	4−5	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	90−95	120−130
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 35% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	6−7	−
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	70−75
medium / 1080p	9−10	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 169% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	10−11	35−40
medium / 1080p	9−10	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 190% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	20−22	70−75
medium / 768p	12−14	45−50
high / 1080p	6−7	24−27
ultra / 1080p	4−5	14−16
4K / 2160p	3−4	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 266% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	75−80	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	40−45
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 50% more, than FirePro V5900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V5900	Quadro K2200M
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Maxwell
Code name	Cayman	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 May 2011	19 July 2014
Pipelines	512	640
Core clock speed	600 MHz	667 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	19.20	26.68
Floating-point performance	614.4 gflops	853.8 gflops
Length	230 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	80 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.0	5
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	66 Mh/s
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+
	Check Price

FirePro V5900 vs Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares