FirePro V7900 vs Quadro K2200M

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V7900 and Quadro K2200M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V7900 stacks up against Quadro K2200M, check out specs charts below.

FirePro V7900 Check Price

Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

	FirePro V7900	Quadro K2200M
Power consumption (TDP)	151 Watt	65 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price

FirePro V7900 has 132% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
FirePro V7900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
FirePro V7900 and Quadro K2200M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V7900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of FirePro V7900 is 58 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
FirePro V7900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 12 MHz higher, than FirePro V7900.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−12	20−22
ultra / 1080p	6−7	12−14
QHD / 1440p	1−2	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	24−27	35−40
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 81% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	18−20	30−35
ultra / 1080p	14−16	27−30
QHD / 1440p	1−2	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	35−40	65−70
medium / 1080p	20−22	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	180−190	230−240
medium / 768p	150−160	200−210
ultra / 1080p	75−80	110−120
QHD / 1440p	45−50	85−90
4K / 2160p	30−33	45−50
high / 768p	110−120	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−33	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	95−100	120−130
medium / 768p	80−85	100−110
ultra / 1080p	50−55	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 32% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	12−14	24−27
ultra / 1080p	12−14	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	5−6	7−8
low / 720p	30−33	50−55
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 73% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	20−22	30−35
ultra / 1080p	14−16	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	80−85	120−130
medium / 1080p	35−40	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 61% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	18−20	30−35
ultra / 1080p	14−16	24−27
QHD / 1440p	5−6	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	40−45	65−70
medium / 1080p	21−24	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 75% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	70−75	100−110
medium / 768p	60−65	90−95
high / 1080p	21−24	40−45
ultra / 1080p	9−10	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 56% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	7−8	12−14
ultra / 1080p	5−6	10−11
4K / 2160p	1−2	2−3
low / 720p	21−24	40−45
medium / 1080p	9−10	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 88% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	100−110	120−130
ultra / 1080p	90−95	−
medium / 1080p	100−105	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 16% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	20−22	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	45−50	70−75
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	21−24	35−40
medium / 1080p	12−14	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	40−45	70−75
medium / 768p	24−27	45−50
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	8−9	14−16
4K / 2160p	7−8	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 73% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	95−100	90−95
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	40−45
high / 768p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 10% more, than FirePro V7900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V7900	Quadro K2200M
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Maxwell
Code name	Cayman	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 May 2011	19 July 2014
Pipelines	1280	640
Core clock speed	725 MHz	667 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	58.00	26.68
Floating-point performance	1,856.0 gflops	853.8 gflops
Length	279 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	80 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.0	5
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		5.0
Bus support	PCIe 2.1 x16
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	171 Mh/s
Optimus		+
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
DisplayPort count	4
Dual-link DVI support	+
Display Port		1.2
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+
	Check Price

FirePro V7900 vs Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares