FirePro W5000 vs Quadro K2200M

In this comparison between FirePro W5000 and Quadro K2200M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W5000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2200M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro W5000 Check Price

Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

	FirePro W5000	Quadro K2200M
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	65 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price

FirePro W5000 has 15% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
FirePro W5000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
FirePro W5000 and Quadro K2200M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W5000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of FirePro W5000 is 158 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
FirePro W5000 and Quadro K2200M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 1812 MHz higher, than FirePro W5000.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	20−22
ultra / 1080p	9−10	12−14
QHD / 1440p	4−5	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	30−35	35−40
medium / 1080p	18−20	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than FirePro W5000.
high / 1080p	24−27	30−35
ultra / 1080p	21−24	27−30
QHD / 1440p	7−8	10−12
4K / 2160p	5−6	7−8
low / 720p	50−55	65−70
medium / 1080p	27−30	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 30% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p	210−220	230−240
medium / 768p	180−190	200−210
ultra / 1080p	95−100	110−120
QHD / 1440p	50−55	85−90
4K / 2160p	30−33	45−50
high / 768p	140−150	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 768p	90−95	100−110
ultra / 1080p	60−65	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 13% more, than FirePro W5000.
high / 1080p	18−20	24−27
ultra / 1080p	16−18	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	6−7	7−8
low / 720p	35−40	50−55
medium / 1080p	18−20	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 36% more, than FirePro W5000.
high / 1080p	24−27	30−35
ultra / 1080p	18−20	24−27
QHD / 1440p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	95−100	120−130
medium / 1080p	50−55	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 28% more, than FirePro W5000.
high / 1080p	24−27	30−35
ultra / 1080p	20−22	24−27
QHD / 1440p	9−10	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	50−55	65−70
medium / 1080p	27−30	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 29% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p	85−90	100−110
medium / 768p	75−80	90−95
high / 1080p	30−33	40−45
ultra / 1080p	12−14	16−18
QHD / 1440p	3−4	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than FirePro W5000.
high / 1080p	9−10	12−14
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−11
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	27−30	40−45
medium / 1080p	12−14	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 41% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 9% more, than FirePro W5000.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	70−75
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 2% more, than FirePro W5000.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	27−30	35−40
medium / 1080p	16−18	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 23% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
medium / 768p	30−35	45−50
high / 1080p	18−20	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−12	14−16
4K / 2160p	8−9	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 32% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	40−45
high / 768p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Quadro K2200M.

Full Specs

	FirePro W5000	Quadro K2200M
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell
Code name	Pitcairn	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	7 August 2012	19 July 2014
Pipelines	768	640
Core clock speed	825 MHz	667 MHz
Transistor count	2,800 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	39.60	26.68
Floating-point performance	1,267 gflops	853.8 gflops
Length	183 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	3200 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	102.4 GB/s	80 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		5.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	154 Mh/s
Optimus		+
Form factor	full height / half length
DisplayPort count	2
Dual-link DVI support	+
Display Port		1.2
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+
	Check Price

FirePro W5000 vs Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares