FireStream 9270 vs Quadro K2200M

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9270 and Quadro K2200M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9270 stacks up against Quadro K2200M, check out specs charts below.

FireStream 9270

Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

	FireStream 9270	Quadro K2200M
Power consumption (TDP)	160 Watt	65 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	No outputs

FireStream 9270 has 146% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
FireStream 9270 and Quadro K2200M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 83 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 1412 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	5−6	20−22
ultra / 1080p	2−3	12−14
QHD / 1440p	2−3	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	14−16	35−40
medium / 1080p	7−8	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	10−11	30−35
ultra / 1080p	8−9	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	21−24	65−70
medium / 1080p	10−12	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 215% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	130−140	230−240
medium / 768p	100−110	200−210
ultra / 1080p	50−55	110−120
QHD / 1440p	27−30	85−90
4K / 2160p	12−14	45−50
high / 768p	75−80	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 108% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	50−55	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 46% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	80−85	120−130
medium / 768p	55−60	100−110
ultra / 1080p	30−35	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 78% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	7−8	24−27
ultra / 1080p	5−6	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	5−6	7−8
low / 720p	16−18	50−55
medium / 1080p	8−9	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	7−8	30−35
ultra / 1080p	0−1	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	120−130
medium / 1080p	18−20	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 171% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	10−11	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	8−9	12−14
low / 720p	21−24	65−70
medium / 1080p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 184% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	50−55	100−110
medium / 768p	−	90−95
high / 1080p	10−12	40−45
ultra / 1080p	5−6	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	6−7
medium / 720p	45−50	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 134% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	3−4	12−14
ultra / 1080p	1−2	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	10−11	40−45
medium / 1080p	5−6	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	90−95	120−130
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 35% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	6−7	−
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	70−75
medium / 1080p	10−11	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 169% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	10−11	35−40
medium / 1080p	9−10	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 190% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	21−24	70−75
medium / 768p	14−16	45−50
high / 1080p	6−7	24−27
ultra / 1080p	4−5	14−16
4K / 2160p	3−4	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 230% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	75−80	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	40−45
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 50% more, than FireStream 9270.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9270	Quadro K2200M
Architecture	TeraScale	Maxwell
Code name	RV770	GM107
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	13 November 2008	19 July 2014
Pipelines	800	640
Core clock speed	750 MHz	667 MHz
Transistor count	956 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	30.00	26.68
Floating-point performance	1,200.0 gflops	853.8 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	3600 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	115.2 GB/s	80 GB/s
DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12
Shader Model	4.1	5
OpenGL	3.3	4.5
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		5.0
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+

FireStream 9270 vs Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares