FireStream 9370 vs Quadro K2200M
When comparing FireStream 9370 and Quadro K2200M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9370 and Quadro K2200M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9370
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro K2200M
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | Quadro K2200M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- FireStream 9370 has 246% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 158 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 412 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 53% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 52% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 31% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 22% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 52% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 42% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 45% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 70% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 14% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 5% more, than FireStream 9370. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | Quadro K2200M | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
Code name | Cypress | GM107 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 19 July 2014 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 667 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 26.68 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 853.8 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |