GeForce 920A vs Quadro K2200M
When choosing between GeForce 920A and Quadro K2200M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 920A and Quadro K2200M.
GeForce 920A
Quadro K2200M
Main Specs
| GeForce 920A | Quadro K2200M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Quadro K2200M has 96% more power consumption, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce 920A and Quadro K2200M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920A is 287 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- GeForce 920A and Quadro K2200M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 3010 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 920A and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 542% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GeForce 920A and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 296% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 468% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 452% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 62% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 800% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920A | Quadro K2200M | |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GK208B | GM107 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 March 2015 | 19 July 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Transistor count | 915 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 26.68 |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 853.8 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.5 | 5.0 |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |