GeForce 940MX vs Quadro K2200M
In this comparison between GeForce 940MX and Quadro K2200M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 940MX will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2200M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K2200M
GeForce 940MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940MX here:
Main Specs
GeForce 940MX | Quadro K2200M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 23 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M has 182% more power consumption, than GeForce 940MX.
- GeForce 940MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce 940MX has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- GeForce 940MX is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2200M - in Desktops.
- GeForce 940MX and Quadro K2200M are build with Maxwell architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940MX is 455 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- GeForce 940MX and Quadro K2200M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 1012 MHz higher, than GeForce 940MX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 173% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−33 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 86% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 70% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 188% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 125% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 169% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 120% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 185% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 26% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 59% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 130% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 153% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 31% more, than GeForce 940MX. |
Full Specs
GeForce 940MX | Quadro K2200M | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
Code name | N16S-GTR-B/S | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 10 March 2016 | 19 July 2014 |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1122 MHz | 667 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1242 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 26.68 |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 853.8 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.0 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 102 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | + |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |