GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs Quadro K2200M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and Quadro K2200M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 mobile will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2200M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K2200M
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 mobile here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | Quadro K2200M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M has 30% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2200M - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is 728 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is 2988 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Fortnite is 61% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Metro Exodus is 82% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 92% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro K2200M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | Quadro K2200M | |
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell |
Code name | N18P-G0, N18P-G61 | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 23 April 2019 | 19 July 2014 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 667 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 99.84 | 26.68 |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 7.5 | 5.0 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs FirePro W8100
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- Quadro K2200M vs FirePro W8100
- Quadro K2200M vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs FirePro S9050
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs GRID M60 8Q
- Quadro K2200M vs FirePro S9050
- Quadro K2200M vs GRID M60 8Q