GeForce GTX 275 vs Quadro K2200M

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 275 and Quadro K2200M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 275 stacks up against Quadro K2200M, check out specs charts below.

GeForce GTX 275 Check Price

Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 275	Quadro K2200M
Power consumption (TDP)	219 Watt	65 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	896 MB	2 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI	No outputs
	Check Price

GeForce GTX 275 has 236% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
GeForce GTX 275 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 275 has 894 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 275 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 275 is 737 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 3878 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 275.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	6−7	20−22
ultra / 1080p	4−5	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	16−18	35−40
medium / 1080p	8−9	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p	10−12	30−35
ultra / 1080p	10−11	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	24−27	65−70
medium / 1080p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 173% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	130−140	230−240
medium / 768p	100−110	200−210
ultra / 1080p	50−55	110−120
QHD / 1440p	27−30	85−90
4K / 2160p	27−30	45−50
high / 768p	75−80	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	75−80	120−130
medium / 768p	55−60	100−110
ultra / 1080p	30−35	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p	8−9	24−27
ultra / 1080p	7−8	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	3−4	7−8
low / 720p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	8−9	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 188% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p	14−16	30−35
ultra / 1080p	10−11	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	60−65	120−130
medium / 1080p	21−24	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p	12−14	30−35
ultra / 1080p	10−12	24−27
QHD / 1440p	1−2	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	24−27	65−70
medium / 1080p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	50−55	100−110
medium / 768p	45−50	90−95
high / 1080p	12−14	40−45
ultra / 1080p	6−7	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p	4−5	12−14
ultra / 1080p	3−4	10−11
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	12−14	40−45
medium / 1080p	6−7	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	90−95	120−130
high / 1080p	85−90	−
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	90−95	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	30−35	70−75
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	10−12	35−40
medium / 1080p	10−12	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	24−27	70−75
medium / 768p	16−18	45−50
high / 1080p	9−10	24−27
ultra / 1080p	6−7	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	40−45
high / 768p	35−40	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 275.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 275	Quadro K2200M
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Maxwell
Code name	GT200B	GM107
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	15 January 2009	19 July 2014
Pipelines	240	640
Core clock speed	1404 MHz	667 MHz
Transistor count	1,400 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	50.6 billion/sec	26.68
Floating-point performance	673.9 gflops	853.8 gflops
Length	10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width	448 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1134 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	127.0 GB/s	80 GB/s
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12
Shader Model	4.0	5
OpenGL	3.0	4.5
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	+	5.0
CUDA cores	240
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options	+
Multi monitor support	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+
	Check Price

GeForce GTX 275 vs Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares