GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Quadro K2200M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro K2200M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2200M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K2200M
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Quadro K2200M
Power consumption (TDP)
134 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost has 106% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro K2200M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is 313 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro K2200M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 5006 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
20−22
ultra / 1080p
9−10
12−14
QHD / 1440p
3−4
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
21−24
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
30−35
ultra / 1080p
21−24
27−30
QHD / 1440p
6−7
10−12
4K / 2160p
5−6
7−8
low / 720p
55−60
65−70
medium / 1080p
30−33
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
210−220
230−240
medium / 768p
180−190
200−210
ultra / 1080p
100−110
110−120
QHD / 1440p
60−65
85−90
4K / 2160p
30−35
45−50
high / 768p
150−160
160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
50−55
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
100−110
100−110
ultra / 1080p
70−75
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
20−22
24−27
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
18−20
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
low / 720p
40−45
50−55
medium / 1080p
21−24
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
30−35
ultra / 1080p
21−24
24−27
QHD / 1440p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
120−130
medium / 1080p
60−65
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
30−35
ultra / 1080p
21−24
24−27
QHD / 1440p
10−11
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
12−14
low / 720p
55−60
65−70
medium / 1080p
30−35
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
medium / 768p
80−85
90−95
high / 1080p
30−35
40−45
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
QHD / 1440p
3−4
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
10−11
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
70−75
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
16−18
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
60−65
70−75
medium / 768p
35−40
45−50
high / 1080p
21−24
24−27
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
4K / 2160p
6−7
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
40−45
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Quadro K2200M
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Code name
GK106
GM107
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
26 March 2013
19 July 2014
Pipelines
768
640
Core clock speed
980 MHz
667 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
62.7 billion/sec
26.68
Floating-point performance
1,585 gflops
853.8 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
192 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
80 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5
OpenGL
4.3
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
+
5.0
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price