GeForce GTX 860M vs Quadro K2200M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 860M and Quadro K2200M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 860M will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2200M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K2200M
GeForce GTX 860M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 860M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 860M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 860M | Quadro K2200M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 860M has 15% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
- GeForce GTX 860M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 860M has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- GeForce GTX 860M is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2200M - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 860M and Quadro K2200M are build with Maxwell architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M is 130 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- GeForce GTX 860M and Quadro K2200M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−105 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
GeForce GTX 860M and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Quadro K2200M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 860M | Quadro K2200M | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
Code name | N15P-GX | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 19 July 2014 |
Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 797 MHz | 667 MHz |
Boost Clock | 915 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.40 | 26.68 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 853.8 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.0 |
CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | + |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |