GeForce GTX 860M SLI vs Quadro K2200M
When comparing GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Quadro K2200M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Quadro K2200M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro K2200M
GeForce GTX 860M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 860M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 860M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 860M SLI | Quadro K2200M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 860M SLI has 84% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
- GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Quadro K2200M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 860M SLI is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2200M - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Quadro K2200M are build with Maxwell architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M SLI is 362 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Quadro K2200M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 12 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 16% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 210−220 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Dota 2 is 6% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Fortnite is 11% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 100−105 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Metro Exodus is 17% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 14% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 15% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 860M SLI | Quadro K2200M | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
Code name | GM107 | |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 19 July 2014 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 667 MHz |
Transistor count | 2x 1870 Million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.68 | |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0 | 12 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | 5.0 |
SLI options | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | + |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |