GeForce GTX 870M vs Quadro K2200M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 870M and Quadro K2200M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 870M will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2200M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K2200M
GeForce GTX 870M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 870M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 870M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 870M | Quadro K2200M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 870M has 53% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
- GeForce GTX 870M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 870M has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- GeForce GTX 870M is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2200M - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 870M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 870M is 274 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- GeForce GTX 870M and Quadro K2200M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 870M and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 870M | Quadro K2200M | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | N15P-GT | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 19 July 2014 |
Pipelines | 1344 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 941 MHz | 667 MHz |
Boost Clock | 967 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 108.3 | 26.68 |
Floating-point performance | 2,599 gflops | 853.8 gflops |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 120.0 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.0 |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | + |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |