GeForce GTX 965M vs Quadro K2200M
When comparing GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro K2200M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro K2200M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro K2200M
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 965M | Quadro K2200M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 965M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 965M has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- GeForce GTX 965M is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2200M - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro K2200M are build with Maxwell architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 277 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro K2200M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 2512 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 965M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
| GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| GeForce GTX 965M and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 965M | Quadro K2200M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Code name | N16E-GS, N16E-GR | GM107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 January 2015 | 19 July 2014 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 944 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 950 / 1151 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,940 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 73.60 | 26.68 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,355 gflops | 853.8 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| G-SYNC support | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.0 |
| CUDA cores | 1024 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 226 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | + |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| GameStream | + | |
| GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| BatteryBoost | + | |
| Check Price |