GeForce MX250 vs Quadro K2200M
When comparing GeForce MX250 and Quadro K2200M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce MX250 and Quadro K2200M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro K2200M
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce MX250 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX250 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX250 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX250 | Quadro K2200M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M has 550% more power consumption, than GeForce MX250.
- GeForce MX250 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x4, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce MX250 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- GeForce MX250 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2200M - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX250 is build with Pascal architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 851 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- GeForce MX250 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 1988 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 53% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 22% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 44% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 38% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 45% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 70% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 14% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce MX250. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX250 | Quadro K2200M | |
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
Code name | N17S-G2 | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 20 February 2019 | 19 July 2014 |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1518 MHz | 667 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1582 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 26.68 |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 6.1 | 5.0 |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |