GRID K140Q vs Quadro K2200M

In this comparison between GRID K140Q and Quadro K2200M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K140Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2200M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID K140Q

Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

	GRID K140Q	Quadro K2200M
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	65 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

GRID K140Q has 100% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
GRID K140Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Quadro K2200M has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GRID K140Q is 183 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
GRID K140Q and Quadro K2200M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 3230 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	20−22
ultra / 1080p	0−1	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	9−10	35−40
medium / 1080p	1−2	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 520% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	−	30−35
ultra / 1080p	1−2	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	8−9	65−70
medium / 1080p	2−3	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 1000% more, than GRID K140Q.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K140Q and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	100−110	230−240
medium / 768p	75−80	200−210
ultra / 1080p	30−33	110−120
QHD / 1440p	−	85−90
4K / 2160p	9−10	45−50
high / 768p	50−55	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 178% more, than GRID K140Q.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−12	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than GRID K140Q.
low / 768p	65−70	120−130
medium / 768p	35−40	100−110
ultra / 1080p	12−14	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 161% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	0−1	7−8
low / 720p	6−7	50−55
medium / 1080p	1−2	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 875% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	−	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
low / 720p	40−45	120−130
medium / 1080p	2−3	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 345% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	10−12	65−70
medium / 1080p	3−4	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 642% more, than GRID K140Q.
low / 768p	35−40	100−110
medium / 768p	−	90−95
high / 1080p	0−1	40−45
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 183% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−11
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
low / 768p	85−90	120−130
high / 1080p	50−55	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 43% more, than GRID K140Q.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	70−75
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	1−2	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3600% more, than GRID K140Q.
low / 768p	3−4	70−75
medium / 768p	−	45−50
high / 1080p	1−2	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2350% more, than GRID K140Q.
low / 768p	65−70	90−95
medium / 768p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−11	40−45
high / 768p	24−27	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 85% more, than GRID K140Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K140Q	Quadro K2200M
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Code name	GK107	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	19 July 2014
Pipelines	192	640
Core clock speed	850 MHz	667 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60	26.68
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	853.8 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	80 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	5.0
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+

GRID K140Q vs Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares