GRID K240Q vs Quadro K2200M

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K240Q and Quadro K2200M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K240Q stacks up against Quadro K2200M, check out specs charts below.

GRID K240Q

Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

	GRID K240Q	Quadro K2200M
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	65 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

GRID K240Q has 246% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Quadro K2200M has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 78 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
GRID K240Q and Quadro K2200M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 12 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−11	20−22
ultra / 1080p	6−7	12−14
QHD / 1440p	1−2	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	21−24	35−40
medium / 1080p	12−14	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	16−18	30−35
ultra / 1080p	14−16	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	35−40	65−70
medium / 1080p	18−20	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 86% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	170−180	230−240
medium / 768p	140−150	200−210
ultra / 1080p	75−80	110−120
QHD / 1440p	40−45	85−90
4K / 2160p	30−33	45−50
high / 768p	110−120	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	95−100	120−130
medium / 768p	75−80	100−110
ultra / 1080p	45−50	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 37% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	12−14	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−12	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	4−5	7−8
low / 720p	27−30	50−55
medium / 1080p	12−14	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 85% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	30−35
ultra / 1080p	14−16	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	75−80	120−130
medium / 1080p	35−40	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 70% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	30−35
ultra / 1080p	14−16	24−27
QHD / 1440p	4−5	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	35−40	65−70
medium / 1080p	21−24	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 84% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	65−70	100−110
medium / 768p	60−65	90−95
high / 1080p	20−22	40−45
ultra / 1080p	9−10	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 60% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	7−8	12−14
ultra / 1080p	5−6	10−11
4K / 2160p	1−2	2−3
low / 720p	20−22	40−45
medium / 1080p	9−10	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 88% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	100−110	120−130
ultra / 1080p	90−95	−
medium / 1080p	100−105	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 16% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	40−45	70−75
medium / 1080p	20−22	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	20−22	35−40
medium / 1080p	12−14	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 61% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	35−40	70−75
medium / 768p	24−27	45−50
high / 1080p	12−14	24−27
ultra / 1080p	8−9	14−16
4K / 2160p	7−8	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 83% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	50−55	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	40−45
high / 768p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GRID K240Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K240Q	Quadro K2200M
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Code name	GK104	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	19 July 2014
Pipelines	1536	640
Core clock speed	745 MHz	667 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	26.68
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	853.8 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	80 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	5.0
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+

GRID K240Q vs Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares