GRID K280Q vs Quadro K2200M

In this comparison between GRID K280Q and Quadro K2200M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K280Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2200M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID K280Q

Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

	GRID K280Q	Quadro K2200M
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	65 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

GRID K280Q has 246% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
GRID K280Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
GRID K280Q has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GRID K280Q is 78 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
GRID K280Q and Quadro K2200M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 12 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	20−22
ultra / 1080p	7−8	12−14
QHD / 1440p	1−2	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	24−27	35−40
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	30−35
ultra / 1080p	16−18	27−30
QHD / 1440p	2−3	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	40−45	65−70
medium / 1080p	21−24	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 75% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	180−190	230−240
medium / 768p	150−160	200−210
ultra / 1080p	80−85	110−120
QHD / 1440p	45−50	85−90
4K / 2160p	30−33	45−50
high / 768p	120−130	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−35	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	100−110	120−130
medium / 768p	80−85	100−110
ultra / 1080p	50−55	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	12−14	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	5−6	7−8
low / 720p	30−35	50−55
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 62% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	30−35
ultra / 1080p	14−16	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	85−90	120−130
medium / 1080p	40−45	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 53% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p	20−22	30−35
ultra / 1080p	16−18	24−27
QHD / 1440p	6−7	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	40−45	65−70
medium / 1080p	21−24	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	70−75	100−110
medium / 768p	65−70	90−95
high / 1080p	21−24	40−45
ultra / 1080p	10−11	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 48% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p	7−8	12−14
ultra / 1080p	6−7	10−11
4K / 2160p	1−2	2−3
low / 720p	21−24	40−45
medium / 1080p	10−11	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 88% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	100−110	120−130
ultra / 1080p	95−100	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 14% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p	20−22	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	45−50	70−75
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	21−24	35−40
medium / 1080p	14−16	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	40−45	70−75
medium / 768p	27−30	45−50
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	9−10	14−16
4K / 2160p	7−8	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 65% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	95−100	90−95
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	40−45
high / 768p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 10% more, than GRID K280Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K280Q	Quadro K2200M
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Code name	GK104	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	19 July 2014
Pipelines	1536	640
Core clock speed	745 MHz	667 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	26.68
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	853.8 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	80 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	5.0
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+

GRID K280Q vs Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares