HD Graphics 515 vs Quadro K2200M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between HD Graphics 515 and Quadro K2200M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the HD Graphics 515 stacks up against Quadro K2200M, check out specs charts below.
Quadro K2200M
HD Graphics 515 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 515 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 515 here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics 515 | Quadro K2200M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M has 333% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 515.
- HD Graphics 515 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- HD Graphics 515 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2200M - in Desktops.
- HD Graphics 515 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 367 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 515.
- HD Graphics 515 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 780% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| HD Graphics 515 and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 173% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 137% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 875% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 293% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 540% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 284% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 2600% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 37% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1133% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1533% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 85% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics 515 | Quadro K2200M | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | Maxwell |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | GM107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 September 2015 | 19 July 2014 |
| Pipelines | 24 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 22.80 | 26.68 |
| Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.97 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |