Iris Graphics 5100 vs Quadro K2200M
In this comparison between Iris Graphics 5100 and Quadro K2200M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Graphics 5100 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2200M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K2200M
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
Iris Graphics 5100 | Quadro K2200M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M has 116% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2200M - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 467 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 310% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Graphics 5100 and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 118% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 100% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 420% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 200% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 255% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 184% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 35% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 75% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 371% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. |
Full Specs
Iris Graphics 5100 | Quadro K2200M | |
Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Maxwell |
Code name | Haswell GT3 | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 5 June 2013 | 19 July 2014 |
Pipelines | 40 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 667 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.00 | 26.68 |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Optimus | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |