Iris Graphics 6100 vs Quadro K2200M
When comparing Iris Graphics 6100 and Quadro K2200M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Graphics 6100 and Quadro K2200M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro K2200M
Iris Graphics 6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
Iris Graphics 6100 | Quadro K2200M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M has 333% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2200M - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 367 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | − | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 143% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 42% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 112% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 271% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 186% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 233% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 178% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 35% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 263% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. |
Full Specs
Iris Graphics 6100 | Quadro K2200M | |
Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | Maxwell |
Code name | Broadwell GT3 | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 5 January 2015 | 19 July 2014 |
Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 667 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 26.68 |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Optimus | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |