Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Quadro K2200M
When comparing Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro K2200M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro K2200M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro K2200M
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Quadro K2200M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M has 333% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2200M - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 367 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | − | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 159% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 46% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 126% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 333% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 215% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 309% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 178% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 43% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 242% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Quadro K2200M | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake | Maxwell |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 10 July 2019 | 19 July 2014 |
Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 667 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 26.68 |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Optimus | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Quadro K2200M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Quadro K2200M vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs FirePro S9050
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs GRID M60 8Q
- Quadro K2200M vs FirePro S9050
- Quadro K2200M vs GRID M60 8Q