Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Quadro K2200M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro K2200M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro K2200M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro K2200M
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Quadro K2200M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M has 333% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 30 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2200M - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 367 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 127% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 71% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 136% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 103% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 118% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 183% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 91% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 120% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Quadro K2200M | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Maxwell |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 19 July 2014 |
Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 667 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 55.20 | 26.68 |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 853.8 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Optimus | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |