Quadro 3000M vs Quadro K2200M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro 3000M and Quadro K2200M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro 3000M stacks up against Quadro K2200M, check out specs charts below.
Quadro K2200M
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 3000M | Quadro K2200M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 3000M has 15% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro 3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro 3000M and Quadro K2200M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro 3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro K2200M - in Desktops.
- Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 217 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 4387 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 380% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 388% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro 3000M and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 108% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 550% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 237% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 560% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 57% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 3000M | Quadro K2200M | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
| Code name | Fermi | GM107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 | 19 July 2014 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.00 | 26.68 |
| Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | 853.8 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 625 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | 5.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 28 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |