Quadro CX vs Quadro K2200M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro CX and Quadro K2200M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro CX and Quadro K2200M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro CX
Quadro K2200M
Main Specs
| Quadro CX | Quadro K2200M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
- Quadro CX has 130% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro CX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro CX has 1534 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro CX is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 65 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- Quadro CX is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 3412 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 460% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 528% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro CX and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 146% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 121% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 675% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 293% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 462% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 237% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 1100% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 700% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro CX | Quadro K2200M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GT200B | GM107 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 | 19 July 2014 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 26.68 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 853.8 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | 5.0 |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |