Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro K2200M
In this comparison between Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro K2200M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro FX 3800 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2200M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 3800
Quadro K2200M
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Quadro K2200M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 66% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K2200M has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 67 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 3412 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 1000% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 178% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 148% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 1033% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 326% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 650% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 284% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 4100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1750% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1533% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 85% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Quadro K2200M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GT200B | GM107 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 | 19 July 2014 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 26.68 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 853.8 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | 5.0 |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |