Quadro FX 4800 vs Quadro K2200M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro K2200M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro FX 4800 stacks up against Quadro K2200M, check out specs charts below.
Quadro FX 4800
Quadro K2200M
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Quadro K2200M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 130% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro FX 4800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1534 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 65 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 3412 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 366% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 450% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 136% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 112% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 550% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 237% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 33% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 560% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Quadro K2200M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GT200B | GM107 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 | 19 July 2014 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 26.68 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 853.8 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | 5.0 |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |