Quadro K2200M vs Quadro M1000M
In this comparison between Quadro K2200M and Quadro M1000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2200M will be the best choice, for others Quadro M1000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K2200M
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2200M | Quadro M1000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 40 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB/4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M has 62% more power consumption, than Quadro M1000M.
- Both video cards are using MXM-A (3.0) interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro K2200M and Quadro M1000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro K2200M is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro K2200M and Quadro M1000M are build with Maxwell architecture.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 326 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M and Quadro M1000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 12 MHz higher, than Quadro M1000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 30% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−105 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 9% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 23% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 22% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 29% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 9% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 2% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 23% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 26% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Quadro K2200M. |
Full Specs
Quadro K2200M | Quadro M1000M | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
Code name | GM107 | GM107 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 19 July 2014 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 640 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 993 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1072 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.68 | 31.78 |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | 1,017 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Shader Model | 5 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | + |
Display Port | 1.2 | 1.2 |
3D Vision Pro | + | + |
Mosaic | + | + |
nView Display Management | + | + |
Check Price |